|
Symbiosis as a Potential Mechanism of Non-Indigenous Plant Invasiveness and Novel Control Strategy
The Problem
Non-indigenous invasive plants have become one of the greatest threats to biodiversity in natural ecosystems around the world. As a result, enormous amounts of finances and resources are expended annually to combat invasive species. For example, in the U.S. it is estimated that a minimum of $34 billion annually is spent to combat invasive plants on agricultural lands. The estimated costs of combating invasive plants on public lands and natural ecosystems is much greater than the amount currently spent on agricultural lands. Although only a small percentage of introduced non-indigenous plant species become invasive, it is not yet possible to predict the invasiveness of a species or the impacts of introductions on native habitats. Currently, control strategies for non-indigenous plants include chemical herbicides, biological agents, and physical removal, all of which have had limited success or are costly. These control strategies reflect short-term fixes and do not represent management solutions based on understanding processes that promote or inhibit colonization of valued landscapes.
 |
Drought
Tolerance
100 symbiotic
and 100 non-symbiotic watermelon seedlings were split into groups
of 10 plants in separate 50ml beakers containing 30 ml water.
Every 24 hours one beaker was emptied and the plants left to
dry. This was continued for 9 days when the beakers were re-filled
with 30 ml water and plants left to recover for 48 hours. The
numbers below the figure indicate days withoug water and % viability
(V). |
| |
Colonized |
Non-colonized |
| Day |
4 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| V |
100 |
70 |
0 |
50 |
10 |
0 |
|
|
Although mechanisms of non-indigenous plant invasiveness have not been defined, it has been theorized that invasiveness is predominantly related to the reduction or absence of herbivorous and/or pathogenic organisms. However, there are few published accounts that substantiate this theory. Until mechanisms that control plant invasiveness in non-native and native habitats are characterized and understood, it may not be possible to design practical and long lasting management strategies.
One of the least studied but critical aspects of plant community structure and dynamics involves symbiotic interactions with endophytic and mycorrhizal fungi. Few, if any, plants in natural ecosystems exist independent of symbiotic associations with mycorrhizal and/or endophytic fungi. In the last several decades it has become apparent that symbiotic fungi and their interactions are important to the structure, function, and health of plant communities. Without these symbiotic associations, it is possible that plant communities may not survive many environmental stresses.
A novel aspect of mutualistic symbioses has recently been discovered at the Western Fisheries Research Center (WFRC). Symbionts isolated from plants growing in habitats that impose high adaptive pressures (e.g. geothermal soils, salt marshes) appear to allow the host plants to tolerate the stresses. This suggests that symbionts are responsible for the adaptation of at least some plants to specific selective pressures and that without symbiosis those plants do not survive environmental stresses. More importantly, "habitat-adapted symbionts" can transfer the ability to survive specific selective pressure to unrelated plants that evolved in completely different habitats.
Objectives
The 5-year research goals within the Invasive Species and Emerging Diseases Program are to: improve capabilities for inventory and multi-scale monitoring of established invaders; and expand research to support prevention and control of invasive species.
The objective of this research is to determine if symbiotic fungi are responsible for the invasiveness of plants in non-native habitats. Specifically, we will test the following three hypotheses:
1 - The invasiveness of introduced species in non-native habitats is due to the establishment of new symbiotic relationships with native fungi that result in one or more of the following fitness benefits: increased growth rates, seed production and viability, disease resistance, herbivore resistance, drought tolerance, nutrient acquisition.
2 - Introduced species transport fungal symbionts with them that act either as pathogens to native species or as enhanced mutualists in non-native habitats and confer one or more of the fitness benefits listed in hypothesis #1.
3 - Termination of symbiotic associations will decrease the invasiveness of introduced species in non-native habitats.
The null hypothesis (H0) for all three hypotheses is that symbiotic fungi are not involved in the invasiveness of introduced plants.
Methodology
Fungi are isolated from surface sterilized plant tissues and grown on standard medium. Plants and seeds will be collected from North Cascades, Olympic, Mt Rainier, Yellowstone and/or Wind Cave National Parks. Plant seeds will be surface sterilized and germinated to produce non-symbiotic (NS) plants. Some of the NS-plants will be colonized with the same fungi isolated from field samples to generate symbiotic (S) plants. Competition studies will be performed between NS- and S-plants to determine if the symbiotic fungi are responsible for invasiveness. In addition, the symbionts will be tested for the ability to confer drought tolerance and enhance growth rates.
 |
Disease
Resistance Symbiotic
and non-symbiotic squash seedlings were planted in soils infested
with the fungal pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Non-symbiotic
plants became stunted and chlorotic after 4 weeks of growth
(shown) and experienced 100% mortality by week 6. Symbiotic
plants were completely resistant to the pathogen. |
|
|
|
Highlights and Key Findings
The proposed research is based on the following observations made at the WFRC (Redman et al., 2001):
- the host range of many fungi is much greater than previously thought and symbiotic fungi are able to colonize unrelated species and cross over between monocots and dicots;
- fungi can express different symbiotic lifestyles in different plant hosts and a single fungus can be a pathogen in one host species and a mutualist or commensal in another, all within the same geographic location;
- mutualistic fungi may confer disease resistance, drought tolerance, growth enhancement, temperature tolerance to several unrelated host species;
- symbiotic fungi are under the same adaptive pressures as host plants and can confer habitat-specific fitness benefits to several unrelated host species;
- disrupting a specific signal transduction pathway results in the death of symbiotic but not non-symbiotic plants regardless of the lifestyle expressed by the symbiont.
Where Are We Headed In 2003
This study will involve isolating fungi from internal tissues of several non-indigenous plant species that have been identified as serious problems by the U.S. NPS (Leafy spurge, St. Johns wort, Ox-eye daisy, and Reed canarygrass). Plants and seeds will be collected from North Cascades, Olympic, Mt Rainier, and/or Wind Cave National Parks. Plant seeds will be surface sterilized and germinated to produce non-symbiotic (NS) plants. Some of the NS-plants will be colonized with the same fungi isolated from field samples to generate symbiotic (S) plants. Competition studies will be performed between NS- and S-plants to determine if the symbiotic fungi are responsible for invasiveness. If symbiotic fungi are found to contribute to plant invasiveness then new control strategies will be developed based on symbiotic interactions.
 |
Growth
Enhancement 20
symbiotic and 20 non-symbiotic tomato plants were grown under
greenhouse conditions. After one month of growth, the average
size of symbiotic plants was twice the size of controls. |
|
|
|
Project Contact
Rusty Rodriguez
U.S. Geological Survey
Western Fisheries Research Center
6505 NE 65th St.
Seattle, WA 98115
Email: rusty_rodriguez@usgs.gov
Phone: 206-526-6282
Fax: 206-526-6654
Publications
|