|
Water
Quality and Other Environmental Variables Associated With Variations in
Population Densities of the Santa Ana Sucker
The Problem
 |
Adult
Santa Ana sucker. |
The Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae), was recently
identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) as a species
of special concern. This sucker is endemic to the Los Angeles, San
Gabriel, and Santa Ana river drainages of southern California. Although
commonly found in these river drainages during the 1970s, only the
San Gabriel River population is now believed to be viable and self-sustaining.
An introduced population occurs in the Santa Clara River, but it
has apparently hybridized with another introduced sucker. In response
to evidence of declining populations, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) was petitioned by the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund,
Inc., to list the Santa Ana sucker as an endangered species. The
petition and supporting documents were reviewed by FWS and determined
to be sufficient to warrant further consideration for listing. During
the status review of this species, FWS will need information on
environmental limiting factors that affect abundance and distribution
of the Santa Ana sucker. This subtask will identify the physicochemical
variables that are most strongly associated with variations in population
density. Without such information, conclusions from the FWS status
review of this species will be couched in greater uncertainty. The
Santa Ana sucker, a member of the sucker family (Catostomidae),
is a relatively small fish that rarely exceeds 200 mm standard length.
Sexual maturity is attained during the second summer of life (age
I+), and adult fish usually die at the end of their third summer.
However, a few individuals may live through a fourth summer (age
III+). The streams in which the Santa Ana sucker is found are subject
to periodic, severe flooding that result in drastic decreases in
sucker densities. However, adaptations such as short generation
time (early maturity), high fecundity, and a relatively long spawning
season (spring through early summer) enable the sucker to rapidly
repopulate streams following floods. Deteriorating environmental
conditions associated with urbanization, water diversions, dams,
pollution, heavy recreational use, gold mining wastes (suction dredging),
gravel extraction, and introduced competitors and predators are
suspected of contributing to the decline in abundance and distribution
of Santa Ana sucker populations. Although some information is available
on status and possible threats facing sucker populations in the
Los Angeles River, the San Gabriel River, and the Santa Ana River,
the specific factors responsible for decline of Santa Ana sucker
populations are unknown. This project is funded under RA# 98-304
between the National Fish & Wildlife Foundation and BRD.
Objectives
The 5-year research goals of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Program
are to understand relationships between and among aquatic species habitats
and provide science for restoring and maintaining declining species and
their required habitat. The purpose of this subtask is to develop a better
understanding of natural and anthropogenic factors responsible for decline
of the Santa Ana sucker. Specifically, this subtask will attempt to identify
the physicochemical variables that are most strongly associated with variations
in population densities of this sucker.
Results from this subtask will enable FWS biologists to better establish
a scientifically defensible link between the decline of sucker populations
and deteriorating environmental conditions. Data collected by this subtask
will also provide a realistic baseline for designing future laboratory
tests that estimate the tolerance thresholds of the Santa Ana sucker to
selected environmental stressors.
Methodology
1. Sampling reaches. Two replicate sampling reaches were established
on selected streams in the Los Angeles basin that historically supported
or currently support endemic populations of the Santa Ana sucker. Study
streams included the Santa Ana River and the San Gabriel River.
2. Sampling
times. All reaches were sampled at quarterly intervals during December
1998-December 1999.
 |
| Mike
Saiki (with backpack electroshocking unit) and several volunteers
electrofishing for Santa Ana suckers. |
3. Fish collections. Santa Ana suckers were sampled
with a battery-powered backpack electroshocker. Immediately after collection,
Santa Ana suckers were hand-sorted from the catch and retained alive
in buckets of water for additional processing. All other fish were identified,
counted, and promptly released. Santa Ana suckers were measured (standard
length) and examined for evidence of breeding tubercles (reproductive
males develop tubercles over most of the body but are most dense on
the caudal and anal fins and the caudal peduncle, whereas reproductive
females possess tubercles only on the caudal fin and the peduncle),
then returned unharmed to the water. When unidentifiable species of
fish were encountered, voucher specimens were preserved in 10% buffered
formalin for later identification with taxonomic keys.
4. Water quality
and quantity measurements. Hydrolab DataSonde multiprobe loggers (Hydrolab
Corporation, Austin, TX) were used to measure the following water quality
variables continuously at 15-min intervals from near the bottom at a
fixed station located at the upstream boundary of each sampling reach:
water temperature, dissolved oxygen concentration, pH, specific conductance,
ammonia, and turbidity. Standard methods were used to make all water
quality measurements. In addition, stream discharge was roughly estimated
by measuring current velocity and water depth at intervals along a cross-sectional
profile of the stream channel. Color photographs were taken at each
sampling reach to supplement written descriptions of salient habitat
features.
 |
| Barbara
Martin recording water quality data at the Santa Ana River.
|
5. Environmental contaminant measurements. During September
1999, samples of Santa Ana suckers (whole fish) were collected in triplicate
from each sampling reach and preserved with methods recommended by chemists
from the BRD Columbia Environmental Research Center. Samples were air
freighted to two FWS-approved contract laboratories for exploratory
analysis of heavy metals and persistent organic compounds.
6. Statistical
analysis. Raw data were stored as Lotus 1-2-3 files (Lotus Development
Corporation, Cambridge, MA) and summarized with SAS (SAS Institute Inc.,
Cary, NC) and other statistical and graphical software. Multivariate
statistical procedures were used to identify environmental variables
that best explain variations in population densities of the Santa Ana
sucker. Unless indicated otherwise, the probability of type 1 error
for all statistical tests will be specified as a=0.05.
Highlights and Key Findings
The purpose of this subtask was to develop a better understanding of
environmental factors responsible for the decline of the Santa Ana sucker
by determining if population attributes of this species at sites where
it is currently abundant, common, and rare or absent varied in relation
to selected environmental variables. Seasonal (once every three months)
electrofishing surveys began in December 1998 and terminated in December
1999 at one site on the East Fork of the San Gabriel River (SGR) and two
sites on the Santa Ana River (near the Metropolitan Water Districts pipeline
in Riverside County, MWD; and at the Imperial Highway bridge in Orange
County, IMP). A total of 7,307 fish was collected from the three sites,
of which 715 were Santa Ana suckers. Santa Ana suckers were captured only
at SGR (average, 6.6 fish/10-min electrofishing) and MWD (average, 2.3
fish/10-min electrofishing). Analysis of length frequency distributions
indicated that three distinct size classes occurred at SGR whereas only
one or two distinct size classes occurred at MWD. These observations suggest
that substantial numbers of suckers in their third year of life were present
at SGR whereas few suckers lived beyond their second year of life at MWD.
Evidence of recruitment (presence of 21-30 mm juveniles, the smallest
standard length category measured during this study) was first detected
in June at MWD and in September at SGR. These findings, along with observations
of breeding tubercles in suckers during March and June at SGR but only
during March at MWD, suggest that reproduction occurs earlier in the year
at MWD than at SGR. Standard lengths attained by presumably young-of-the-year
suckers in December averaged 36-48 mm at SGR and 63-65 mm at MWD. Comparison
of relative weights indicated that, on average, body condition was higher
among suckers from SGR than from MWD. Although gut contents of suckers
from both sites in September 1999 consisted almost entirely of organic
detritus (a mixture of unrecognizable plant material) and sand, animal
foods (aquatic insects and other invertebrates) were slightly more important
in fish from SGR (2.4-2.5%, damp-dry weight basis) than from MWD (0.8%).
Body burdens of selected environmental contaminants (organochlorines and
trace elements) measured in suckers from SGR and MWD were not elevated
beyond average concentrations reported in freshwater fishes from throughout
the United States. Relative abundance of Santa Ana suckers was inversely
correlated with specific conductance and stream discharge, and directly
correlated with relative abundance of Santa Ana speckled dace (Rhinichthys
osculus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). However,
results from multiple regression analysis indicated that the abundances
of arroyo chub (Gila orcutti) and rainbow trout, the only independent
variables retained by the statistical model, accounted for nearly 89%
of the variation in Santa Ana sucker abundance.
Where Are We Headed In 2003
A final report for this work has been completed. In FY-03, we will attempt
to draft a technical manuscript for submission to a professional journal.
Project Contact
Michael Saiki
U.S. Geological Survey
Western Fisheries Research Center
Dixon Duty Station
6924 Tremont Road
Dixon, CA 95620-9648
Email: michael_saiki@usgs.gov
Phone: 707-678-0682 x617
Fax: 707-678-5039
Publications
|